∃ 1 ilawgic real(tiv)ity - ðime§pace Сemotions: its vital åðions (2025)

Look around: We are all made of space=form, information and time=motion, energy which constantly change into each other, and entangle together forming the dimensional motions, 'dimotions' that organize all systems of the Universe. Reality is not mechanical but a vital game of Exist¡ence, a tug of war between mind-points that process time energy into space ordering its body-territories avoiding Tt-flow of death=entropy that dissolve its form. Newton's absolute spacetime is false. In a Relational time§pace theory (Leibniz, Einstein), the relativity principle that make motion=time and position=form=space, relative to each other stands as the 'ultimate' nature of the game of exist¡ence - extended in the dual principle of conservation of energy: 'All what exists is motion=time and form=space that trans-form into each other ad eternal". The unit of reality is space dimension combined with time motions. 6 dual diemotions, build reality: Tt (EXTERNAL & internal Motion, or entropy that destroys a systems structure o & Ss (INTERNAL & external form or language) being - 2 limits of no form & no motion, between which Ts-locomotion or momentum, (internal form and EXTERNAL MOTION) & St-information (INTERNAL FORM and external motion) interact transferred in ∞ combination of s≥t (ïnformation)≈t≥s, energy that transform into each other ad eternal. space=form+ time=motion diemotional combinations, entangled dimensional networks and scales and Planes of exi=ST¡ence conceive reality translating ALL laws of ALL sciences to the 2 ultimate substances of reality, space and time further reduced to time=motion, as space=form is either mental space (a still mapping of time motions) or toporganic space (cyclical knots of time motion seen without detail as still forms). Alas from 1 comes 2 from 2 comes 3 and from 3 the ∞ beings' ZhuangziRelativity creates reality.Thus Stience adds to mathow its vital orghys, studying spacetime matter as knots of vital, Diemotional åðions which Ss-spinscan its ST-WORLD with its St-particheads, Ts-moving its st-bodywave to Tt-feed on ◊-¡ energy forces in which to reproduce its ◊§+¡nformation and survive.Tense wor(l)ds & differential equations are mirrors of 3 timespace stages: pastime energy x future spatial information=reproductive present & ¡ts ±3 S◊T diemotional aðions, Ss-entient languages of form, St-gauging information, Ts-to move thru the ST-WORLD toward Tt-feed in a field of st-energy in which to to st-reproduce its @siMetric organic form. Thus the 6 diemzotional actions= vital events that form all absolute real(tiv)ities are also the cause of its lifetime-death worldcycles of existence, which put together establish 3 global Diemotions of timespace, pastime ◊future spatial information = present, reproductive, iterative immortal state... the goal of all beings.Any ◊° Real(tiv)ity an infinitesimal ◊-¡ can measure is made of Dimensional forms of space with time motions (ab. Diemotions), evaluated in its relative state against an ◊¡ LARGER, slower background WORLD. Thus stience requires a scalar, ◊±¡ Structure to reality. Those planes of ◊§scalar matter are made of Timespace Diemotions, a spiritual substance whose sensorial form moves. Sensorial motion, ab. emotion is the matter of our cœxistience. Its lanwaves and laws are a 'fluid ðot' that permeates it all. Yet its formalism is crystal clear, deterministic. For if we only have 2 states, space=form and time=motion, measure across ◊±¡ relative §¡zes, we get 6 diemotions, St,sT,st,ST,Ss,TtSo the first ilogic task of a stientist is to recognize in the Maya of the senses those variations. This is the 'matter' of D¡namics that studies the 6 time§pace D¡emotions of reality made of ±∆ðimenergy<=>§patial information flows ordered in sequential worldcycles.Reality starts when we measure its dimensions of space and motions of time, or rather its combinations & transformations in the minimal events of reality we can perceive - a change of state from S-form into T-motion, S>T or vice versa, a T-motion that stops into a mirror form language of mental space. Interactions between the 2 states of coexistence in relative synchronicity, simultaneity is the stuff of which reality is made. To do so a Still Space, a Point of Truth, an ◊-¡infinitesimal §-mind must measure states of motion and form in reference to a LARGER WORLD. It is the principle of ilogic, absolute relativity that complements that of digital relativity studied by Physicists to make sense of the interaction of space=formal, mental states and timemotions.3 elements are needed for any ilogic measure, an ◊-¡ still small ø-mind, whose language mirrors the changes of states of form and motion of a relative ◊° territorial body wave embedded in a larger ◊¡ WORLD. This implies the minimal truth requires 3 relative scales of spacetime states, which we represent with the generator symbol of ilogic, as one of its relative sub-events, ∆, -∆, ^, v, >, <, «», represents a transformation of a being along its 3 relative dimensional motions, longomotion, hinformation or reproduction.Dimensions of space have motions of time but can be perceived depending on the phenomenology of the observer - its speed of perception - as forms dilated in present space or as points in motion against that larger WORLD: There is then the need of internal synchronicity clocks within the 3 parts of the being, limbfields, bodywaves and ¶articheads for it to be in existence. Absolute relativity then becomes absolute spacetime for each relative organisms whose membrain isolates it from the OUTER WORLD introducing an inner world of order, a configuration space of ◊-¡eternal energy which gives it a Point of Truth, a Point of measure...

The 'Space-Time' Fundamentals

A discussion of the concepts of 'space' and 'time' as a dual requisite feature of creation has been provided, herein. It is further emphasized that neither space nor time can exist independently, necessitating the definition of an integral concept dubbed as the 'space-time.' Furthermore, it is elaborated that space and time both represent a same phenomenon related to creation and light mechanics, in which 'time' epitomizes the 'free-flowing' nature of the process of creation, and 'space' represents its 'congealment.' Thus, the two concepts of space and time are competing in nature, representing the inverse of one another, with the propensity to one diminishing the other. It is explicated that at the center of cosmos, the notion of time is overwhelmingly pre-dominated, with everything strongly gravitating and free-flowing towards the SOURCE. And, the concept of space becomes more evident as one expands away from the SOURCE, in which the free-flowing time gives way to its congealment. In particular, the outermost portions of the cosmos are associated with the realm of physicality in which the notion of space becomes predominant, providing a favorable medium for experimentation in space-time, and accordingly, achieving consciousness expansion. And, the notion of fully predominant space becomes apparent in the first harmonic universe ), with time becoming more elusive or intangible, giving the illusion of infinitesimally linear, with the impression of past-present-future. However, time is clearly a circular phenomenon, having its origin with the concept of gravitation or rotational motion about the SOURCE. Through the process of discretization of the time vector it is possible to define a series of 356 discrete 'main' space-time layers or 'dimensions,' with the lowest numbers referring to the lowest degree of free-flowing of time (or highest extent of congealment of space), in which the extent of gravitational attraction towards the SOURCE is comparatively less, giving rise to a slow rate of rotation (frequency) about the SOURCE. This is consistent with the observation that in the lower dimensions, the extent of light of consciousness intensity (light quotient) as well as proximity to the SOURCE (propinquity) is less, necessitating the need for consciousness expansion. A distinction has been elucidated to the concept of directionality of time, one corresponding to rotating clockwise about the SOURCE, giving rise to an 'inner' aspect of a given dimension being contracted towards the SOURCE (the so-called 'ethereal'), and another, corresponding to rotating counter-clockwise about the SOURCE, giving rise to an 'outer' aspect of a dimension being expanded away from the SOURCE (the so-called 'physical'). This gives rise to the advent of two contrasting worlds that occupy the same space, yet run in opposite times with an oscillatory motion for a point of consciousness occupying a particular dimension that is referred to as 'vibration.' One sense of rotational motion about the SOURCE defines the world of 'matter,' and the other, the world of 'antimatter.' And, the fabrics of space-time, matter and antimatter, are stealth to one another and can never physically or chemically interact with one another. The phenomenon of 'primary time' governs the formation of the main discrete 356 dimensions, all revolving at different speeds about the SOURCE. Similarly, a 'secondary' aspect of time may be considered analogous to the primary time indicated earlier. Here, one can discretize time 'locally' into infinite segments, with each defining a different 'facet' of the local space-time spheroidal surface layers that are rotationally located at different 'phase angles' with respect to the SOURCE. Alternatively, one may consider that each distinct facet of the local space-time layer defining local 'parallel' sub-dimensions are rotating at different speeds about a local 'source' that is our soul or HIGHERSELF. The rate of change of such a 'phase angle' with respect to local time may be defined as the 'local frequency,' which is analogous to the 'non-local frequency' defined with respect to the SOURCE. This way, we have essentially fragmented our soul into different 'soul aspects,' all rotating at the same non-local rotational frequency, each occupying a different parallel dimension running with a different phase angle. When the analogy of different facets of a given space-time layer is considered, a phase angle, in turn, represents the rotational position of the gate of entry of a particular parallel dimension with respect to the SOURCE. In particular, within the 3 rd dimension, the parallel sub-dimensional layers are defined through definition of the 'local' or 'secondary' time that appears to progress in an infinitesimally linear fashion, yet again, time is always circular and has no beginning or end. Thus, the linear perception of time arising from the anticipation of the next ("future") increment or perception of the "past" is delusional. In reality, it all happens simultaneously in the 'NOW moment.' In essence, it all depends on the 'attention span' as to what is transpiring! In the context of local NOW, it is the totality of the soul (the HIGHERSELF) that is privy to see what is transpiring at once. In the case of 'absolute' NOW, it is only the Prime Creator who can have a presence everywhere and at all time, with the attentional span that is capable to see ALL that transpires, synchronously, and instantaneously.

SPACE, TIME, AND (how they) MATTER: A Discussion of Some Metaphysical Insights about the Nature of Space and Time Provided by Our Best Fundamental Physical Theories

This paper is a brief (and hopelessly incomplete) non-standard introduction to the philosophy of space and time. It is an introduction because I plan to give an overview of what I consider some of the main questions about space and time: Is space a substance over and above matter? How many dimensions does it have? Is space-time fundamental or emergent? Does time have a direction? Does time even exist? Nonetheless, this introduction is not standard because I conclude the discussion by presenting the material with an original spin, guided by a particular understanding of fundamental physical theories, the so-called primitive ontology approach.

Time, space and reality: an analysis from physics

2001

Space, Time, and (how they) Matter: a Discussion about some Metaphysical Insights Provided by our Best Fundamental Physical Theories

2016

This paper is a brief (and hopelessly incomplete) non-standard introduction to the philosophy of space and time. It is an introduction because I plan to give an overview of what I consider some of the main questions about space and time: Is space a substance over and above matter? How many dimensions does it have? Is space-time fundamental or emergent? Does time have a direction? Does time even exist? Nonetheless, this introduction is not standard because I conclude the discussion by presenting the material with an original spin, guided by a particular understanding of fundamental physical theories, the so-called primitive ontology approach.

Psychomechanics and the Trio of Space, Time and Consciousness: The Principle of Minimum Effort

In the realm of classical physics, there are several phenomena whose precise understanding requires the role of consciousness of the observer/instrument. In such cases all the three in the trio of space, time and consciousness need to be considered in the theory on the same footing rather than neglecting the role of consciousness under some simplifying assumptions. An easy way to incorporate consciousness in the theory is by way of introducing a meditation variable, µ, and treating the same at par with the time variable. It may be mentioned that it is the consciousness that creates the event-based space, time and geometry in the outer world out of the experience-based space, time and geometry of the mental world. In fact, at gross level the role of "mind" (an attribute of consciousness) is now translated into the variable µ which, in some sense, also accounts for the attention and/or concentration of an individual. Some possible factors are explored on which the intensity of meditation can depend. An energy-like function for conscious systems, the so-called "mindset function" M , is introduced. In general, M is a function of experience-based space and time or of event-based space and time including µ. In analogy with the action integral of classical mechanics, an "effort integral" is constructed here perhaps for the first time and the extremeness of this integral is investigated using the tools of calculus of variation. The viability of the resultant psycho-dynamical equations is demonstrated by solving them for some particular situations. Keywords: Consciousness energy, meditation variable, experience-based and event-based space and time intervals, effort integral. With regard to the absolute reality in Nature recall the three world concept of Karl Popper and Eccles (Popper and Eccles, 1981). The three worlds considered here are: world-1, which really exists; world-2, which can be perceived, and world-3, which can be modeled by (objective) scientists. Ideally speaking, the world-1 is purely a matter of realization and the world-2, involving the individual-based process of perception or the "internalization of the exterior", can be explored in terms of space, time and consciousness or the variants of the latter, like mediation, attention, concentration, etc., can also be used. The world-3 is the game of space-time mediated models and the associated interactions, of course for a conscious observer whose consciousness is often ignored at every stage of modeling

The Emergence of Space and Time

The Routledge Handbook of Emergence, 2019

Research in quantum gravity strongly suggests that our world in not fundamentally spatiotemporal, but that spacetime may only emerge in some sense from a non-spatiotemporal structure, as this paper illustrates in the case of causal set theory and loop quantum gravity. This would raise philosophical concerns regarding the empirical coherence and general adequacy of theories in quantum gravity. If it can be established, however, that spacetime emerges in the appropriate circumstances and how all its relevant aspects are explained in fundamental non-spatiotemporal terms, then the challenge is fully met. It is argued that a form of spacetime functionalism offers the most promising template for this project. Space and time, it seems, must be part and parcel of the ontology of any physical theory; of any theory with a credible claim to being a physical theory, that is. After all, physics is the science of the fundamental constitution of the material bodies, their motion in space and time, and indeed of space and time themselves. Usually implicit, Larry has given expression to this common intuition: What could possibly constitute a more essential, a more ineliminable, component of our conceptual framework than that ordering of phenomena which places them in space and time? The spatiality and temporality of things is, we feel, the very condition of their existing at all and having other, less primordial, features... We could imagine a world without electric charge, without the atomic constitution of matter, perhaps without matter at all. But a world not in time? A world not spatial? Except to some Platonists, I suppose, such a world seems devoid of real being altogether. (45) The worry here, I take it, goes beyond a merely epistemic concern regarding the inconceivability of a non-spatiotemporal world; rather, it is that such a world would violate some basic necessary condition of physical existence. It is contended that space and time partially ground a material world. The alternative to a spatiotemporal world, it is suggested, is a realm of merely abstract entities. 1 Part of what it means to be 'physically salient' (Huggett and Wüthrich 2013) is to be in space and time. In other words, what it is to give a physical explanation of aspects of our manifest world is, among other things, to offer a theory of how objects are and move in space and time. * I thank Robin Hendry and Tom Lancaster for their insightful and challenging comments on an earlier draft of this paper. This work was partly performed under a collaborative agreement between the University of Illinois at Chicago and the University of Geneva and made possible by grant number 56314 from the John Templeton Foundation and its content are solely the responsibility of the author and do not represent the official views of the John Templeton Foundation. 1 The defenders of the claim that the world is purely abstract, formal, or mathematical-as opposed to partly abstract, formal, or mathematical-are usually referred to as 'Pythagoreans', rather than as 'Platonists'.

The Nature of Time: Geometry, Physics and Perception (NATO ARW)

2003

A Discussion Related To The Existence of The Entities of Space and Time

SSRN Electronic Journal

Humans need the entity of Space to perceive relative positions between objects. Humans also need the entities of Space and Time to calculate values that Humans attribute to Motions, such as Velocity or Acceleration. The entities of Space and Time are also the entities that compose the four-dimensional Interwoven Space/Time entity, introduced by Einstein’s General Relativity theory, which provided an explanation of the origin of the attraction between Mass bodies. However, although the notions of Space and Time, as Humans perceive these notions, do provide the significant explanation of the origin of the attraction between Mass bodies, via Einstein’s General Relativity theory, the notions of Space and Time, as Humans perceive these notions, are not sufficient for providing explanations to additional similar unanswered questions, such as : what is the origin of the attraction or the repulsion between Electrically Charged bodies? Or, why the velocity of Light, measured by Humans, always results in a constant value and the maximum velocity that Humans can measure? This paper presents the following prediction: Electric (or Magnetic) Fields are forms of Accelerations, like the Gravitational Field, which is already recognized as a form of Acceleration. This prediction also leads to the following thesis: Changes and Movements are the result of Interactions between Energies, and the entities of Space and Time are not entities that exist. The entities of Space and Time are notions (or entities), invented by Humans, because Humans need such notions to perceive Changes and Motions. For some Interactions between Energies, which result in Changes or Motions, Humans can attribute, to these Interactions, attributes of Space and Time, which will assist in providing explanations to why these Changes or Motions are the result of these Energies Interactions. However, this paper predicts, that different sets of Interactions between Energies, should be assigned separate and independent attributes of Space and Time, different and independent from the Space and the Time attributes, assigned to other sets of Interactions between Energies, to provide an explanation for the origin of motions which are yet unexplained, such as: what is the origin of the attraction or the repulsion between Electrically Charged bodies? 2 Because different and independent Space and Time attributes should be assigned to different sets of Interactions between Energies, then, Space and Time, as Humans perceive these notions, cannot exist, because the above implies, that there should be multiple, independent notions of Space, and multiple, independent notions of Time, and not just one universal Space entity, and just one universal Time entity, as Humans perceive the Space and the Time entities. By abandoning the conclusion that the entities of Space and Time exist, and by concluding that Changes and Motions are only the results of Interactions between Energies, the origin of attraction or repulsion between Electrically Charged bodies can be explained, in addition to the explanation, already provided by Einstein’s General Relativity theory, relating to the origin of the attraction between Mass bodies. Also, by abandoning the conclusion that the entities of Space and Time exist, and by concluding that Changes and Motions are only the results of Interactions between Energies, a possible partial, tentative explanation might be also provided to the question: why the velocity of Light, measured by Humans, always results in a constant value and the maximum velocity that Humans can measure? The prediction that the entities of Space and Time do not really exist sounds as an extraordinary, unbelievable, and out of line statement, at first. This is because, as presented above, the notions of Space and Time are crucial notions, which Humans need them, to perceive, understand and calculate Motions and Changes. However, this paper also proposes a relatively simple experiment, which if implemented, and its results will be successful, as this paper predicts, this will either validate or disprove, what is presented in this paper.

The True Nature of Space-Time

viXra, 2015

The change of the state of motion of physical systems is characterized by the change of its velocity; an important aspect of Relativity Theory (RT). Quantum mechanics (QM) implies space-time itself may be quantum in nature if QM is to comply with RT geometrically; i.e. Loop quantum gravity theory (LQG) as a quantum space-time. The nature of time and its intimate relationship with space as described by RT is not so obviously defined but dealt with as an abstract entity that exists in physical reality. But physical reality demands similar dynamical space-time notion as mostly expressed by LQG. Here, following the concept of quantum space-time, I describe time as a numerical value of space such that the rules of RT are satisfied. Length contraction, time dilation and the forward arrow of time are explained accordingly. The intention here is to add dynamical aspect to the notion of time by defining it as a property of the dynamical space itself under the rules of RT but adding a dynamic...

What Humans Perceive as Time and Space are just Facets of Energy

What Humans Perceive as Time and Space are just Facets of Energy, 2022

Physics might bring recollections of boring and frustrating physics classes at high school, and complicated, long, cumbersome equations based on frightening Mathematics. This is not Physics. Science in general, and the science of Physics in particular, are about human endeavors to understand Nature, the Universe, and the Existence in general. Indeed, Physicists rightfully insist on presenting Physics theories using Mathematics, because Mathematics is the language that Science and Physics utilize, because it is based on unambiguous and precise statements. But if the layer of Mathematics from fascinating Physics theories is peeled off, what is revealed is a layer of fascinating ideas, based on human ingenuity. As stated already above, Mathematics provides validity to Science and Physics theories, because it provides unambiguousness and precision to the elements presented in these theories. But the basics ideas, from which the elements of this layer, of human ingenuity emerged, can be usually presented also by using just common language, because Physics ideas can be also presented, with a limited use of Mathematics. This is what this book tries to do. As already stated above, Science in general, and the science of Physics in particular, are about human endeavors to understand Nature, the Universe, and the Existence in general. As such, in the last few centuries, Science and Physics made significant progress in unveiling many mysteries about Nature and the Universe. Although Mathematics provides unambiguousness and precision to the elements presented in Science and Physics theories, no Science and Physics theory is assumed to be the ultimate truth and embed complete validity, because, after all, all these theories are based on humans' ideas, and limited humans' ability to understand Nature. An acceptable measure of validity of a Science and Physics theory is its compliance with physical experiments, which test the validity of its results. Nevertheless, also these experiments are based on limited humans' ability to devise complete full proof experiments, which might result in observations, which cause the necessity to correct a Science or a Physical theory, or even replace it, with a totally new theory, which better complies, with the most recent observations. And, although Science and Physics theories utilize Mathematics to present their statements, still Physics embeds many unresolved questions regarding Nature and the Universe, and it also embeds quite a few peculiarities and paradoxes. Some of these unresolved questions, peculiarities, and paradoxes, that still exist in the Science of Physics today, are the subject of this book. The author of this book is not a physicist by profession and education. The author of this book is a retired Electronics Engineer. However, many years ago, when the author of this book was a young student at high school, the author of this book found the drive to understand appealing. For example, when the author of this book understood that Einstein's General Relativity Theory concluded, that Mass is just a form of Energy, the author of this book tried to understand why the Electric Charge is not also recognized as a form of Energy, based on many similarities between the Mass and the Electric Charge entities. Recently, when the author of this book retired, he could concentrate on delving into such issues and finalizing the ideas that resulted in several published papers, and this book. As already stated above, this book is about attempts to explain some Physics unanswered questions, peculiarities, and paradoxes, which resulted in a revolutionary conclusion: Time, Space, and the Electric Charge are just forms (or facets) of Energy, like Mass is already recognized and accepted by the science of Physics as a form of Energy, following the introduction of Einstein's Special Relativity Theory. This also boils down into another revolutionary conclusion: Nature is composed of only one entity: Energy!!! From the dawn of civilization humans are struggling to understand Nature. Many ideas, tools and theories were developed during this quest, in attempts to narrow down the elements that are important in understanding Nature. However, the science of Physics today still uses many elements to explain Nature, such as Energy, Mass, Electric Charge, Forces, Fields, Space, Time, etc. This book concludes that all the elements, or entities, used by the science of Physics to explain Nature are just facets of one entity: Energy. As already stated above, the conclusion that Nature is composed of only one entity, Energy, is the result of attempts to explain some unanswered questions, peculiarities, and paradoxes, that still exist in the science of Physics today. These attempts use analysis, which is based only on nowadays acceptable Physics theories, and uses only thinking experiments, logic, and reason, as the tools to carry over this analysis. Although the thinking experiments, login, and reason, used in the above-described analysis, seem as very sound and very difficult to contradict, these cannot be sufficient, to provide complete validity, to what is presented in this book. Thus, in addition to the above, this book also proposes several experiments. If these experiments will be executed, and their results will be successful, as this book predicts, this might provide validity, to what is presented in this book. These experiments require means and funds which are beyond the reach of the author of this book.